Skip to main content

How can Leadership Capabilities impact Ethical Decision-Making?


In today’s interdependent and rapidly changing world, numerous challenges threaten our ability to create sustainable and principled societies. True leadership requires a compelling vision, the ability to inspire and hold close both the moral and ethical values interwoven into our lives (Greenfield & Ribbins, 1993).

Current literature (Ehrich, Harris, Klenowski, Smeed & Spina, 2015) identifies the heightened awareness of the ethical dimensions of educational leadership in a context of increasing performance driven accountability. The key challenges involve tensions between opposite value positions (Cranston, Ehrich, & Kimber, 2006) where leaders need to navigate the shades of grey, for example, common good versus individual rights; care versus rules; loyalty versus justice; and long-term versus short-term perspectives. (Duignan, 2006). 

The opposing value positions above, identify complexities leaders have when considering the perspective nuances of the situation. Consequently, the ethics involved are “a dynamic and continuing activity rather than an adherence to a system of moral codes and ... formal policy statements” (Niesche and Haase, 2012, p. 2). There is an acknowledgement that moral codes are important; however, this is balanced by the consideration of situational dynamics and context.

Ethical leaders appreciate that the world is interdependent. They make constant decisions that allow them to be resilient to pressures by holding on to the ethical behaviors required to advocate for student, teachers and parents. Through ethical behaviours and applying fairness in decision making we commit to providing students with a fair learning environment that promotes excellence for all people. 

With this frame of thought, I draw on my own capabilities to inform decision making process. These capabilities are skills, beliefs and capacities that are developed over the course of my life experience and are like seeds planted and shaped from my earliest discourses.



Dewey (1933) suggests that reflective thinking is the active, persistent and careful consideration of a belief, grounds that support that knowledge and the further conclusions to which that awareness leads. Likewise, intuitive connection is seeing the blind spots (Dyer, 2000) and working to address them before they become problematic. Procrastination can sabotage intuitive connection as I can allow myself to become sidetracked.

I view my professional commitment as the means that I mediate between my beliefs that bring about student learning and my professional goals. It ties closely to my philosophical conviction regarding lifelong learning and commitment to generating enthusiasm produced by an environment respectful to the student’s background. It also demonstrates an affinity to my school’s vision to have each person known and loved.

My capacity as a disruptive change agent to see the bigger picture and begin moving towards it as an early adopter is an example of strategic readiness (Fabry & Higgs, 1997). To revolutionise the complex system of education, “people need to be within the comfort zone of disruptiveness and momentum” (Breakspear, 2016), working like a domino effect, one small adaption leading to another one. As iterative change is applied ideas are clarified, incubated and amplified. In starting small, ideas create energy and success before a larger rollout. By engaging the collective expertise, solutions to the problems can be developed.

Ultimately, this small-incubated change in teacher leader practice is a variable that causes changes in student learning that move us forward to better learning outcomes. “If we want to do better things for students, we have to become the guinea pigs and immerse ourselves in new learning opportunities... We rarely create something different until we experience something different.” (Couros, 2015, p. 52)

Managerial expertise is a capacity that I am continuing to develop and is linked to my technical leadership discussion previously mentioned. Mentoring and coaching in this role has addressed some of these deficits; however, strategic planning and goal setting in this area will be a focus of the future.

Capable leaders are centrally concerned with making decisions that are aligned with their personal morals and organisational integrity. They make these as a means to improve outcomes for students and fulfill the organisational vision (Duignan, 2006). Leaders see themselves as learners (McGough, 2003) and as part of the overall knowledge-building learning community.  

Love to hear your thoughts.

References:
Breakspear, S. (2016) Quote from the AISNSW Learning Leaders Professional Learning 21 January 2016, 99 York St Sydney.
Couros, G. (2015) The Innovator’s Mindset, Dave Burgess Consulting, San Diego.
Cranston, N., Ehrich, L. C., & Kimber, M. (2006). Ethical dilemmas: the “bread and butter” of educational leaders' lives. Journal of Educational Administration44(2), 106-121.
Dewey, J. (1933). A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. DC Heath.
Dinham, S. (2005). Principal leadership for outstanding educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration43(4), 338-356.
Dyer, K. M., & Carothers, J. (2000). The intuitive principal: A guide to leadership. Corwin Press.
Ehrich, L.C., Harris, J, Klenowski, V, Smeed, J.L., & Spina, N. (2015). The centrality of ethical leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 197-214.
Fabry, D. L., & Higgs, J. R. (1997). Barriers to the effective use of technology in education: Current status. Journal of Educational Computing Research,17(4), 385-395.
Greenfield, T. and Ribbins, P. (eds.) (1993), Greenfield on Educational Administration: Towards a Humane Science, London, Routledge.
McGough, D. J. (2003). Leaders as learners: An inquiry into the formation and transformation of principals’ professional perspectives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis25(4), 449-471.
Niesche, R., & Haase, M. (2012). Emotions and Ethics: A Foucauldian framework for becoming an ethical educator. Educational Philosophy and Theory44(3), 276-288.

Images
http://pursuant-blog.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/shutterstock_166079051-e1456778844634.jpg
http://blogs.longwood.edu/amandancomm310/files/2012/10/opposing_views.jpg
http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-reflective-thinking-is-like-the-crock-pot-of-the-mind-it-encourages-your-thoughts-to-john-c-maxwell-91-15-80.jpg
http://www.lascom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/change-management.jpg
http://9904-presscdn-0-10.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/integrity-quote.png

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How do we Build a Culture of Inquiry and Data Use?

School systems have a shared responsibility to improve student learning outcomes. Likewise, for staff there is an obligation to provide extended opportunities to build on what they already know. High quality recording methods that ascertain growth mapped over time can identify trends and highlight threats allowing organisations to predict implications of applying a learning initiative or intervention. This can become complex and messy due to competing agendas and a variety of interpretations. For this reason, organisations have an obligation to develop a fair, ethical and shared understanding how data will be used and interpreted (Stoll & Fink,1996). A strong and user-friendly data system when properly implemented, empowers teachers to discover value in functions that bring student data to their fingertips (Brunner, Fasca, Heinze, Honey, Light, Mandinach & Wexler , 2005). Therefore, teachers require adequate learning support if they are to use data to improve practice

Managing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the classroom

As educators, we all understand the importance of ensuring that students submit their own work and are not cheated of their success by others. However, with the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom, it can be difficult to ensure that students are not cheating on assignments. Fortunately, there are a number of measures that educators can take to minimise the possibility of cheating while still using AI to their advantage. Here are a few tips to help you manage the use of AI and minimise cheating by students on assignments. 1. Set Clear Guidelines The first step in preventing cheating is to set clear guidelines about the use of AI and make sure that students understand the expectations. Make sure students are aware that AI-generated work is not permitted and that any work submitted must be their own. 2. Monitor Student Activity Monitoring student activity through AI can help you identify any potential cheating. AI can be used to detect plagiarism and other sign

What does a post-industrial class look like? Part 2

This post is the second part of a series that I have been working on to identify what  does a post-industrial class look like? In my previous post , I looked at using video, collaborative discussion, grouping and student-centred learning. Why a large display and one to one? The large electronic display is used as it offers many benefits to a given lesson; these include demonstration and modelling as the teacher could showcase the application or video from the board (Moss, et al, 2007). It is easy to show the important features of particular web-based activities and have students interact with the material on their own devices. The board can accommodate different learning styles (Herrington & Harrington, 2006). Interactive boards can help tactile learners by touching and marking the board. Audio learners can have the class discussion and auditory multimedia, visual learners can see what is taking place as it develops at the board and it offers multimodal learning which can b