Skip to main content

What are some of the challenges of instructional leadership and how can they be overcome?

Leadership Capacity
Unquestionably, a principals primarily obligation is for the learning of the students, as such, leading instruction is the core business of the school leader. However, in truth, dedicating the time for planned and ongoing instructional leadership, as well as overcoming the pertinacious difficulty of devoting time to effective and sustainable instructional growth is an obstacle that school leaders on all levels face. Spillane, Halverson & Diamond, (2001) point out is the principal does not have to be the expert on everything, but is the instructional leader. The expertise can come from others in the building but such operation should be distributed through the school.

Moving away from one-person leading the school (Spillane, 2005; Lambert, 2002) and establishing greater capacity from within their team to carry and direct the load, principals can create opportunities by identifying teacher leaders and advocates who will clearly communicating the purpose the desired achievement gains. However, this intention can be potentially risked when expanding leadership as the development of a clear mission and sense of purpose can become perplexed with more moving parts and personal agendas (York-Barr & Duke, 2004).

An example could be, seen through the following analogy. A school leader was providing support to their teachers by popping in and being visible; however, due to the management and high administrative load they had was not able to impact the development of instruction throughout the school they desired. Therefore, with good intent, they handed this action of being visible and available to other leaders. Unfortunately for the leader, those who were given the job did not understand the principles of instructional rounds as desired by the leader, resulting in teachers feeling as this “pop in” by others was their practice being judged and assessed. Though the intention was to increase connection and capacity, the initiative broke down due to the transmission of intent and vision.

Multiple and Competing Goals
Adjoining this challenge for instructional leaders is multiple and competing goals. As schools set strategic plans, they often state targets in specific areas, unfortunately these priorities are not always congruent with each other and the timing of implementation may not be meticulously considered for example, rollouts of new syllabus’. It is essential; however, to look for strategies to manage change when dealing with the complexities of strategic goals and curriculum as these ensure the greatest success can be achieved (Leander & Osborne, 2008).

Skill Development and Mastery
Furthermore, challenges relating to skill development and mastery are considerable for instructional leadership. Strategic, interpersonal; planning; instructional observation; research and evaluation skills (Lashway, 2002) are all necessary to create an environment in which staff and student growth is expected.

What practices can educational leaders consider and implement in order to lead teaching and learning in their educational setting?
School leadership is a priority around the globe as the educational leader has an influential role in inspiring, motivating, affirming and also challenging or extending the practice and pedagogy of educators, along with increasing academic outcomes for students. With this in mind, Dinham states, “Educational leaders require a thorough grounding in instructional leadership for clinical teaching if real change towards evidence-based teaching practice is to occur” (2013, p.225). They also require a sense of where the organisation has come from and the culture in which it is becoming.

Though we face many challenges, they are worth working to overcome to ensure the greatest success can be achieved for the school and the learners within it.


References
Dinham, S. (2013). Connecting clinical teaching practice with instructional leadership. Australian Journal of Education, 57(3), 225-236.
Lambert, L. (2002). A framework for shared leadership. Educational leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
Lashway, L. (2002). Developing instructional leaders.
Leander, K. M., & Osborne, M. D. (2008). Complex positioning: Teachers as agents of curricular and pedagogical reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 23-46.
Spillane, J. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69, 143-150.
Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational researcher, 30(3), 23-28.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74(3), 255-316.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How do we Build a Culture of Inquiry and Data Use?

School systems have a shared responsibility to improve student learning outcomes. Likewise, for staff there is an obligation to provide extended opportunities to build on what they already know. High quality recording methods that ascertain growth mapped over time can identify trends and highlight threats allowing organisations to predict implications of applying a learning initiative or intervention. This can become complex and messy due to competing agendas and a variety of interpretations. For this reason, organisations have an obligation to develop a fair, ethical and shared understanding how data will be used and interpreted (Stoll & Fink,1996). A strong and user-friendly data system when properly implemented, empowers teachers to discover value in functions that bring student data to their fingertips (Brunner, Fasca, Heinze, Honey, Light, Mandinach & Wexler , 2005). Therefore, teachers require adequate learning support if they are to use data to improve practice

Managing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the classroom

As educators, we all understand the importance of ensuring that students submit their own work and are not cheated of their success by others. However, with the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom, it can be difficult to ensure that students are not cheating on assignments. Fortunately, there are a number of measures that educators can take to minimise the possibility of cheating while still using AI to their advantage. Here are a few tips to help you manage the use of AI and minimise cheating by students on assignments. 1. Set Clear Guidelines The first step in preventing cheating is to set clear guidelines about the use of AI and make sure that students understand the expectations. Make sure students are aware that AI-generated work is not permitted and that any work submitted must be their own. 2. Monitor Student Activity Monitoring student activity through AI can help you identify any potential cheating. AI can be used to detect plagiarism and other sign

What does a post-industrial class look like? Part 2

This post is the second part of a series that I have been working on to identify what  does a post-industrial class look like? In my previous post , I looked at using video, collaborative discussion, grouping and student-centred learning. Why a large display and one to one? The large electronic display is used as it offers many benefits to a given lesson; these include demonstration and modelling as the teacher could showcase the application or video from the board (Moss, et al, 2007). It is easy to show the important features of particular web-based activities and have students interact with the material on their own devices. The board can accommodate different learning styles (Herrington & Harrington, 2006). Interactive boards can help tactile learners by touching and marking the board. Audio learners can have the class discussion and auditory multimedia, visual learners can see what is taking place as it develops at the board and it offers multimodal learning which can b