Skip to main content

Thornburg's Learning Spaces

Thornburg's Learning Spaces Theory (2014) is a revolutionary approach to classroom management that focuses on creating learning environments that are both engaging and effective. Created by David Thornburg Ph.D., an award winning futurist and educational consultant, the theory is based on the idea that students should be able to move freely in the classroom, and that learning should be an interactive process. 

The theory is built on the metaphor of four primary learning spaces: the campfire, the waterhole, the cave and life; however, is not limited to these.

The campfire is a central gathering place for social interaction, explicit teaching and collaboration where they work together in a comfortable and inviting atmosphere. It is a place where students can share their ideas and experiences, be guided in direct instruction to grow their understanding and work together to solve problems. The campfire is a place where discussion, collaboration, brainstorming and problem-solving activities can be facilitated, and where ideas and projects can be shared. To make the most of the campfire, teachers are intentional in fostering an environment of open dialogue.

The waterhole is a space for exploration and inquiry. It is an informal place where students can explore new topics and ask questions of the teacher or of others. It is a space where ideas are enhanced like an incubator and iterated upon.

The cave is a place for contemplation and reflection. It is a place in the classroom where students can go to work on individual projects or to complete independent work. Their focus is on quietly contemplating and diligently completing the learning tasks at hand or making connections to the material.
Finally, life is how students apply the learning beyond the classroom. It is how they are using it to shape who they are and who they are becoming as citizens with character.

These archetypal learning spaces are designed to foster a dynamic learning environment that encourages students to think critically and engage with the material. In order to make the most of this theory, teachers should consider the following strategies. 

First, teachers should create a learning space that allows students to move freely throughout the classroom. By providing students with ample space to move, teachers can ensure that their students are able to explore and interact in the different learning spaces. With the use of flexible furnishings, classrooms can be transformed from campfire to waterhole to cave giving the students the mental structures required to understand what is expected within each of these phases of learning. 

Second, teachers should create a learning environment that encourages collaboration and social interaction. By providing students with opportunities to work together, teachers can foster meaningful conversations and interactions between students. 

Third, teachers should provide students with tools and resources that allow them to explore and inquire. By providing students with access to online resources and authentic rich problems, teachers can ensure that their students are able to explore different topics, ask questions and work on problems that have meaning to them. 

Finally, teachers should provide students with opportunities to reflect and contemplate the learning. By providing students with quiet spaces to reflect and make connections, teachers can ensure that their students are able to fully engage with the material.

The learning spaces that David Thornburg has described are examples of reflexive spaces, “physical environments that both inform pedagogical encounters and are informed by pedagogical encounters via a bi-directional relationship between the physical environment and inhabitants” (Cleveland, 2016, p.45).

To that end, David Thornburg's Learning Spaces Theory provides teachers with the tools they need to create dynamic and engaging learning environments. By applying these strategies and providing students with the necessary resources, teachers can ensure that their students are able to make the most of their learning experience.

References:
Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyse socio-pedagogical reform in middle years education. In K. Fisher (Ed.), The Translational Design of Schools (pp. 27-49). Melbourne: Sense.

Thornburg, D. (2014). From the Campfire to the Holodeck: How Place Matters in Education. In SITE-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How do we Build a Culture of Inquiry and Data Use?

School systems have a shared responsibility to improve student learning outcomes. Likewise, for staff there is an obligation to provide extended opportunities to build on what they already know. High quality recording methods that ascertain growth mapped over time can identify trends and highlight threats allowing organisations to predict implications of applying a learning initiative or intervention. This can become complex and messy due to competing agendas and a variety of interpretations. For this reason, organisations have an obligation to develop a fair, ethical and shared understanding how data will be used and interpreted (Stoll & Fink,1996). A strong and user-friendly data system when properly implemented, empowers teachers to discover value in functions that bring student data to their fingertips (Brunner, Fasca, Heinze, Honey, Light, Mandinach & Wexler , 2005). Therefore, teachers require adequate learning support if they are to use data to improve practice

Managing the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the classroom

As educators, we all understand the importance of ensuring that students submit their own work and are not cheated of their success by others. However, with the increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom, it can be difficult to ensure that students are not cheating on assignments. Fortunately, there are a number of measures that educators can take to minimise the possibility of cheating while still using AI to their advantage. Here are a few tips to help you manage the use of AI and minimise cheating by students on assignments. 1. Set Clear Guidelines The first step in preventing cheating is to set clear guidelines about the use of AI and make sure that students understand the expectations. Make sure students are aware that AI-generated work is not permitted and that any work submitted must be their own. 2. Monitor Student Activity Monitoring student activity through AI can help you identify any potential cheating. AI can be used to detect plagiarism and other sign

Impactful Instruction!

Deep Learning through balanced approaches to Direct Instruction and Inquiry-Based Learning. This blog post draws inspiration from Rachel Lehr's recent insights (2023) on the instructional framework employed by Dayton Public School, particularly their Instructional Playbook and an article from Jay McTighe and Harvey Silver (2020) called Instructional Shifts to Support Deep Learning. Lehr's message struck a chord due to its enlightening and encouraging nature. The strategies encapsulated within the playbook not only find their roots in a robust evidence base but also vividly illustrate the advantages of embracing a balanced approach to education. Dayton Public Schools' Instructional Playbook, as highlighted by Lehr, exemplifies a comprehensive and well-founded framework for effective teaching and learning. The strategies it contains are deeply rooted in educational research, showcasing the value of a well-rounded and diverse approach to education. This playbook serves as a t