Skip to main content

Organisation - How can the Classroom be Managed?

The ability of teachers to organise classrooms and manage the behaviour of the students is critical to achieving positive educational outcomes. Student learning is the primary goal of effective classroom management and thus the inability of teachers to effectively manage classroom behaviour according to Harrell et al., (2004) contributes to the low achievement of at risk students.  Instruction that is effective in encouraging higher rates of academic engagement and on-task behaviour is characterised instruction which has significant to the students, is planned, sequential and logically ordered to develop skills, offers frequent opportunities for students to respond and guides practice through immediate feedback (Carnine, 1976).

The use of rules and routines is a powerful preventative component of classroom organisation and management plans. Rules establish the behavioural context of the classroom by specifying what behaviours are expected and the consequences of inappropriate behaviour. The rules are stated to describe the expected behaviour. Routines allow the teacher to effectively organise their classroom allowing them to run efficiently with fewer disruptions enabling the teacher to attend to other aspects of teaching (Brophy, 2006). Rules should have a strong preventive role. An example of this was during my professional experience I observed a myself constantly reprimanding a student for putting down other students. I was aware that this action was taking time away from active learning of the class, on guidance of my mentor teacher; we put into place a simple preventive option, a set of rules stating expected behaviour to guide the effective language towards others in school and at home.

Research has revealed that creating a collaborative learning environment presents as an additional method for classrooms to be managed (Slavin, et al., 2003). Activating students as learning resources for one another produces some of the largest gains seen in any educational interventions, provided two conditions are met. Principles which I experienced regarding collaborative learning environments were that the learning environment must provide for group goals, so that students are working as a group, rather than just working in a group. The second is individual accountability, so that each student is responsible for their contribution to the whole, so there can be no ‘passengers’. When students worked within these principles group work was very productive on the other hand though when they wanted to do their own thing group work became very counterproductive and disruptive.

References
Carnine, D. (1976) Effects of two teacher-presentation rates on off-task behaviour, answering correctly and participation. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 9(2), 199-206.
Brophy, J. (2006) History of research on classroom management. In C.M. Evertson & C.S Weinstien (Eds.) Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 17-43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harrell, P., Leavell, A., Van Tassell, F. and McKee, K. (2004) No teacher left behind: Results of a five-year study on teacher attrition. Action in Teacher Education, 26, 47-59.
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. M. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement. In W. M. Reynolds & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology volume 7: educational psychology (pp. 177-198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being a Globally Connected Educator with a Globally Connected Classroom

As educators we live is such an exciting time to teach. With the onset of the Internet we have had the ability to  embed and curate videos ,  gamify ,  blog , have  Minecraft in the classroom ,  flip the learning , use  QR Codes , access  social media  and potentially  video conferencing  some educators could see that it is too much; however, I see its potential to benefit students and enhance professional development for educators.  There has been no time in history where access to information has been so immediate and available. The potential for teachers to connect and be supported in collaboration, not bound by schools, districts, states and even nations inspires me. I am acutely aware that being globally connected presents the ability to bring expertise, skill and knowledge into my classroom beyond my capabilities.  The networks that I have help me to design activities that measure students’ higher-order thinking skill...

Bridging Cognitive Load Theory and Adaptive Pacing: Optimising Working Memory in the Modern Classroom

Introduction: The Architecture of Learning In an era saturated with rapid technological innovation and evolving curricular mandates, educational leaders and teachers face a recurring dilemma: how to maintain pedagogical integrity while managing the complex cognitive demands placed on students. Learning is fundamentally an alteration in long-term memory (Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006). However, the bottleneck of human architecture remains the limited capacity of working memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). When classroom delivery fails to account for cognitive architecture, learners experience cognitive overload, hindering schema acquisition and deep conceptual understanding. To cultivate resilient, self-directed learners, educators must bridge the gap between cognitive architecture and adaptive teaching practices—balancing scaffolding with gradual release to ensure sustained achievement. https://realtraining.co.uk/2024/10/adaptive-teaching-understanding-the-barriers...

Thornburg's Learning Spaces

Thornburg's Learning Spaces Theory (2014) is a revolutionary approach to classroom management that focuses on creating learning environments that are both engaging and effective. Created by David Thornburg Ph.D., an award winning futurist and educational consultant, the theory is based on the idea that students should be able to move freely in the classroom, and that learning should be an interactive process.  The theory is built on the metaphor of four primary learning spaces: the campfire, the waterhole, the cave and life; however, is not limited to these. The campfire is a central gathering place for social interaction, explicit teaching and collaboration where they work together in a comfortable and inviting atmosphere. It is a place where students can share their ideas and experiences, be guided in direct instruction to grow their understanding and work together to solve problems. The campfire is a place where discussion, collaboration, brainstorming and problem-solving activi...